ALife in Organizations
(ALife ∈ Org)

August 17th, Waterloo, Canada

Call For Conversation

ALife in Organizations: Reframing societal problems with Artificial Life and Complex Systems perspectives


We cordially invite you to join the conversation at the Third International Workshop on ALife in Organizations: hosted as part of the Artificial Life conference in Waterloo.

This year, we’re doing something a little different. Rather than inviting submissions for workshop papers, we’re taking the opportunity to hear from key figures across the community and bring together a range of perspectives, approaches, and questions at the intersection of artificial life, complex systems, and human organizations.

The workshop asks what an artificial life and complex systems lens contributes to our understanding of human organizations and institutions—not only as systems to model, but as a source of practical leverage on problems where societies are stuck. We have put the same question to each of our invited speakers:

How does an artificial life or complex systems lens reframe a societal problem, and what does that reframing suggest about how we might change it?

Across the workshop, invited talks and panel discussions will explore different ways of approaching this question, spanning diverse societal challenges, theoretical perspectives, and practical approaches to organizational and institutional change.

We hope the result will be a lively conversation across disciplines and viewpoints, offering new ways to think about familiar problems—and perhaps new possibilities for acting on them.

We would be delighted to have you join us for the discussion.


Jeremy Pitt
Legal Personhood and the ‘Right to ALife’ in Inter-Organisational Socio-Technical Systems

Jeremy Pitt
Legal Personhood and the ‘Right to ALife’ in Inter-Organisational Socio-Technical Systems

Abstract: The talk proposes a socio-technical imaginary to explore the implications of including agentic ALife in socio-technical systems that cross organisational boundaries. In these systems, the ‘socio’ components can be both humans (natural life, or NLife) and agentic computational processes (artificial life, or ALife). These inter-dependent components then use the same ’technical’ substrate (‘dumb’ machines, tools, services, etc.) to interact through a shared signalling system, according to the same mutually-agreed institutional rules, recognising the same inter-organisational roles, structures, and processes. In these systems, at a time when a credible political party to form a future UK government proposes to withdraw from the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR), and in the context of Norbert Wiener’s “the human use of human beings’’, we maintain that the needs of human factors, user experience and NLife rights are paramount. Nevertheless, it is also necessary to consider issues of legal personhood for ALife, even up to a “right to ALife’’, especially in the context of possible conflicts between NLife and ALife, and between process persistence and environmental pressures. We conclude with a discussion of how this systemic lens could lead to a pre-emptive reframing of the problems in representing, reasoning about and enforcing both NLife and ALife rights, should this socio-technical imaginary come to be realised.

Hiroki Sayama
TBA

Hiroki Sayama
TBA

Abstract: TBA

TBA
TBA

TBA
TBA

Abstract: TBA

TBA
TBA

TBA
TBA

Abstract: TBA

Program Information
Room 3: 10:30-12:30 and 15:30-17:30
Organizing Team

Stavros

Stavros Anagnou

University of Hertfordshire

Imy

Imy Khan

Independent Researcher

Nathan

Nathan Lloyd

Ontario Tech University

Contact us